Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court allowed defendant insurance carrier reimbursement of medical expenses insured received from third party also insured by defendant
• court allowed defendant insurance carrier reimbursement of medical expenses insured received from third party also insured by defendant
• court allowed insurer reimbursement of medical expenses paid to insured under one policy from a different insured under a separate policy
• neither contract language nor public policy prohibited insurance company from seeking “reimbursement” from plaintiff for medical expenses out of settlement with third-party tortfeasor, who was also insured by the same insurance company
• “[T]he rule prohibiting subrogation against one’s own insured . . . involve[s] situations in which the insurer paid out on a loss to its insured and then sought to hold a second coinsured party under the same insurance contract liable for the loss.”
• interpreting endorsement amending an insurance policy’s medical payments coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).