Maynard v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APP. COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that appellate court will not disturb Unemployment Appeals Commission action unless there is a lack of competent substantial evidence to support that action
• stating that the appellate court will not disturb UAC action unless there is a lack of competent substantial evidence to support that action
• “[T]he credibility of witnesses and testimony is a matter which falls solely within the purview of the ... finder of fact”.
• “[T]he credibility of witnesses and testimony is a matter which falls solely within the purview of the . . . finder of fact.”
• “The general rule is that changes may be made in the duties of an employee, so long as they are reasonable and are usual for the particular position for which the employee was hired.”
• employee was not guilty of misconduct when she refused to work a different schedule or accept a lower-paying position when her new schedule varied substantially from the previous one and the employer did not give her a viable alternative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).