Maynard v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding drainage-related negligence and nuisance claims were preempted where drainage problem was alleged to have been caused by the construction and/or maintenance of the railroad tracks and crossings themselves
• stating that \section 10501(b) of the ICCTA expressly preempts Plaintiff's [common-law tort] claims\
• stating that “section 10501(b) of the ICCTA expressly preempts Plaintiff’s [common-law tort] claims”
• “[S]everal federal circuit and district courts . . . have consistently held that the ICCTA preempts state common law claims with respect to railroad operations.”
• \[S]everal federal circuit and district courts ... have consistently held that the ICCTA preempts state common law claims with respect to railroad operations.\
• “[T]he ICCTA is a separate and distinct statute from the FRSA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).