MAYKEL BEIRO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate courts examine evidence in light most favorable to district court’s findings
• “If the Legislature had intended to create liability for any individual employee who engaged in an unfair employment practice in the employment setting, it could have done so without resorting to a theory of aiding and abetting liability.”
• an appellate court reviews “the district court’s factual findings for clear error”
• “If the Legislature had intended to create liability for any individual employee who engaged in an unfair employment practice in the employment setting, it could have done so without resorting to a theory of aiding and abetting liability.”
• applying “severe or pervasive” standard to MHRA sexual harassment claim
• “[W]e review the district court’s factual findings for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).