Mayfield Water & Light Co. v. Graves County Banking & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “a specific venue 23 provision will control over a general provision” and applying the ERISA venue provision instead of the general venue provision.
• finding benefits claims related to 400 separate plans arose out of the same series of transactions because each claim was “part of the larger systematic behavior” by the same plan administrator
• “Even if the [complaint] does not allege that all claims were actually appealed and exhausted, if futility is sufficiently alleged, exhaustion may not be necessary.”
• “Every patient purportedly signed an 25 ‘Assignments of Rights and Benefits,’ assigning the patients’ health insurance benefits and an 26 array of related rights to their providers.”
• “Courts may take judicial notice of public records, including court records from another case.”
• “The Court may take judicial notice of a fact ‘that is not subject to 26 reasonable dispute because it . . . can be accurately and readily determined from sources 27 whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.’ Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).