· 1/31/1990
Mayfield v. Sullivan
Citations
- 730 F. Supp. 180
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1002
- 1990 WL 9746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]ffirmative defenses that purport to reserve the right to add affirmative defenses at a later date … are stricken because they are improper reservations under the Federal Rules.”
- “[A]ffirmative defenses that purport to reserve the right to add affirmative defenses at a later date … are stricken because they are improper reservations under the Federal Rules.”
- “[A]ffirmative defenses that purport to reserve the right to add affirmative defenses at a later date … are stricken because they are improper reservations under the Federal Rules.”
- striking similar reservation of rights affirmative defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holderman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.