· 12/20/1996
Mayfield v. Patterson Pump Company
Citations
- 101 F.3d 1371
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33193
- 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,432
- 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1153
- 1996 WL 695486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff’s failure to meet terms of employment was a sufficient reason for termination under the second part of the McDonnell Douglas test
- explaining plaintiff must provide significant probative evidence on the issue of pretext
- “Conclusory allegations of discrimination, without more, are not sufficient to raise an inference of pretext or intentional discrimination where [an employer] has offered . . . evidence of legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions.”
- “Conclusory allegations of discrimination, without more, are not sufficient to raise an inference of pretext ... where an employer has offered extensive evidence of legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions.” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Fay, Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.