Skip to main content
· 12/20/1996

Mayfield v. Patterson Pump Company

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 1371
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33193
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,432
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1153
  • 1996 WL 695486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff’s failure to meet terms of employment was a sufficient reason for termination under the second part of the McDonnell Douglas test
  • explaining plaintiff must provide significant probative evidence on the issue of pretext
  • “Conclusory allegations of discrimination, without more, are not sufficient to raise an inference of pretext or intentional discrimination where [an employer] has offered . . . evidence of legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions.”
  • “Conclusory allegations of discrimination, without more, are not sufficient to raise an inference of pretext ... where an employer has offered extensive evidence of legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions.” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Fay, Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.