Mayfair Detectives, Inc. v. Karp Metal Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Appellate Division’s dismissal of an indictment for lack of particular effect jurisdiction, stating that the indictment was “defective on its face”
• affirming the Appellate Division’s dismissal of an indictment for lack of particular effect jurisdiction, stating that the indictment was “defective on its face”
• considering multiple bases for venue and noting that “the evidence adduced before the Grand Jury [need only] permit[] a fair and reasonable inference” of jurisdiction under one of the theories advanced by the prosecution
• considering multiple bases for venue and noting that “the evidence adduced before the Grand Jury [need only] permit[] a fair and reasonable inference” of jurisdiction under one of the theories advanced by the prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).