Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/4/1982
Mayes v. State
Citations
- 440 A.2d 1093
- 50 Md. App. 628
- 1982 Md. App. LEXIS 240
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding advisement sufficient to convey unanimity requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mason, Liss, Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HugginsIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 13×
- Kackley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-07· cited 10×
- Suggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-08-27· cited 8×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-08· cited 7×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-02-11· cited 5×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-31· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Countess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-10· cited 81×
- State v. RuskCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-13· cited 75×
- Hazel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-02-17· cited 61×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-07· cited 37×
- Peter Kenneth Demarrias v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1972-01-03· cited 28×
- State v. RickettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-22· cited 20×
- Blotkamp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-03-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.