Mayes v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 21 damages claims against public school district administrators in their official capacities are barred 22 by the Eleventh Amendment
• holding that 2 damages claims against public school district administrators are barred by Eleventh Amendment 3 immunity
• holding that damages claims against public school district administrators 5 are barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity
• finding plaintiff 6 adequately pled claim when plaintiff stated he presented the 7 alleged defect for repair multiple times
• dismissing ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims 3 | brought against individual school administrators
• “An interference action, on the other hand, has a broader scope than retaliation since interference does not necessarily concern discrimination or retaliation for engaging in a protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).