Skip to main content
· 2/13/2015

MAYES, LATESHA S. v. LAPLATNEY, THOMAS D.

Citations

  • 125 A.D.3d 1488
  • 3 N.Y.S.3d 857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases and holding “that district courts have jurisdiction to consider successive § 3582(c)(2) motions”
  • remanding for reconsideration when the district court mistakenly relied on a probation officer’s earlier statement when it denied a sentence-reduction motion under Amendment 782
  • Res judicata prevents collateral attack on a final judgment in a lawsuit between the same parties
  • 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.