Skip to main content
· 3/28/2000

Mayers v. Anderson

Citations

  • 93 F. Supp. 2d 962
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4920
  • 2000 WL 381943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[If petitioner] made a timely request to have the conduct adjustment board consider this [video] evidence, the court concludes that he was entitled to have the board either consider the videotape or state on the record why it would not review the tape.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.