· 3/28/2000
Mayers v. Anderson
Citations
- 93 F. Supp. 2d 962
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4920
- 2000 WL 381943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[If petitioner] made a timely request to have the conduct adjustment board consider this [video] evidence, the court concludes that he was entitled to have the board either consider the videotape or state on the record why it would not review the tape.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.