Mayer v. Illinois Northern Railway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s affidavit alleging a delay of over two years in scheduling surgery to replace broken pins in hip was enough to survive a motion for summary judgment because the affidavit created a factual dispute
• determining that a two-year delay in surgery to correct broken pins in hip that caused Plaintiff extreme prolonged pain was a sufficiently serious effect
• determining that a two-year delay in surgery to correct broken pins in hip that caused Plaintiff extreme prolonged pain was a sufficiently serious effect
• officials delayed arranging corrective hip surgery for over two years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).