Skip to main content
· 5/16/2024

Maye v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • error was clear or obvious because, although “this court had not [yet] definitively answered” the question presented, the caselaw on the issue among all five of our sister circuits was “uniform[]”
  • applying Tapia in the revocation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.