Maycock v. Gravely Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior version of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5533(b) does not contain any language implicating retroactivity
• after action has become barred by an existing statute of limitations, no subsequent legislation will remove the bar or revive the action
• after action has become barred by an existing statute of limitations, no subsequent legislation may remove the bar or revive the action
• “Needless to say, the Superior Court cannot overrule Supreme Court decisions.”
• held that a minor injured prior to the effective date of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5533(b), who attained majority before the effective date, and whose claims are time-barred by applicable statute of limitations prior to the effective date of § 5533(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).