Mayberry v. Akron Rubber MacHinery Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that supplier of component parts which were not defective did not have duty to warn subsequent product manufacturer and employees of danger that might arise after components were assembled according to manufacturer's exclusive design
• rejecting a products-liability claim based on the “critical” fact that the products at issue “were not manufactured by [defendant]”
• no duty to warn members of profession against dangers known to members of that profession
• no duty to warn members of profession against dangers known to members of that profession
• under Oklahoma law of strict liability, applying § 402A, questions whether manufacturer's product was in a \defective condition\ and \unreasonably dangerous\ are two separate requirements of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).