Indiana Supreme Court· 2/14/1893
May v. State
Citations
- 133 Ind. 567
- 33 N.E. 352
- 1893 Ind. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We think it quite clear that there may be a claim or demand without any right to sue for its recovery.\
- “We think it quite clear that there may be a claim or demand without any right to sue for its recovery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McIntosh v. Melroe Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-05-26· cited 110×
- State v. RendlemanIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-11-23· cited 85×
- Johnson v. GuptaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-07-21· cited 8×
- State v. Williamson Polishing & Plating Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-01-22· cited 3×
- Perkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1969-02-24· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.