May v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that passing pill bottle between individuals is sufficient reasonable suspicion even if pills are not actually seen
• explaining that it is not absolutely necessary for an officer to observe drugs or money change hands in order to support a reasonable suspicion that a drug offense was committed and deference should be given to the officer’s perspective
• “[I]n determining whether an officer has a reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop, some deference should be given to the officer’s perspective and the officer’s training and experience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eric K. Manning
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-10-02· cited 11×
• State v. Cruse
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-11· cited 7×
• Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-16· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-20· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Popple v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
• State v. Stevens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-07· cited 168×
• Origi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 15×
• Santiago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-22· cited 12×
• State v. Davis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-25· cited 11×
• BENEMERITO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 3×