May v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court held that an escalating pattern of more serious offenses is not a factor scored under the guidelines and constitutes a proper reason for departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-05· cited 21×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-29· cited 19×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-19· cited 9×
• Pittman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-31· cited 7×
• Middleton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-28· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-18· cited 7×
• DeGroat v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-15· cited 5×
• Brier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-03· cited 3×
• Floyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-09· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hendrix v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 329×
• Amlotte v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-06· cited 65×
• Higgs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-06· cited 25×
• Burke v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-20· cited 25×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-18· cited 17×
• Amlotte v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-12· cited 17×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-14· cited 14×
• Fenn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-07· cited 5×