· 4/4/1988
May v. Oldfield
Citations
- 698 F. Supp. 124
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12378
- 1988 WL 116437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ”[T]he pendency of an appeal does not destroy the finality of a judgment for the purpose of applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel.”
- noting federal and state cases addressing this issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilhoit
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.