Skip to main content
· 4/4/1988

May v. Oldfield

Citations

  • 698 F. Supp. 124
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12378
  • 1988 WL 116437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ”[T]he pendency of an appeal does not destroy the finality of a judgment for the purpose of applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel.”
  • noting federal and state cases addressing this issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilhoit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.