May v. Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had pleaded sufficient facts showing “joint activity” to survive motion to dismiss aiding and abetting discrimination claim, despite not being “models” of proper pleading
• holding the plaintiff pleaded sufficient facts showing “joint activity” to survive motion to dismiss aiding and abetting discrimination claim
• “A claim of aiding and abetting is wholly derivative of the underlying discrimination claim, and thus cannot be maintained unless the plaintiff has also stated a claim alleging prohibited acts.”
• “A claim of aiding and abetting is wholly derivative of the underlying discrimination claim, and thus cannot be maintained unless the plaintiff has also stated a claim alleging prohibited acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).