Skip to main content
· 8/10/2009

May v. George

Citations

  • 910 N.E.2d 818
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 1049
  • 2009 WL 2431900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering several factors to conclude that the plaintiff failed to establish traffic patterns and land use that warranted imposing a duty and failed to establish that the defendant had notice of the tree’s condition
  • considering several factors to conclude that the plaintiff failed to establish traffic patterns and land -12- No. 2--08--0995 use that warranted imposing a duty and failed to establish that the defendant had notice of the tree's condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.