Skip to main content
· 2/3/1992

May v. Charles Booher & Associates, Inc. (In Re May)

Citations

  • 141 B.R. 940
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 995
  • 1992 WL 159814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting Kovacs as providing that, “where the debtor must expend money to comply with an injunction, the obligation arising under the injunction is a ‘debt’ ” 6
  • Chapter 7 discharge no bar to employer pursuing injunction against debtor for future breaches of covenants not to compete

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbara J. Sellers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.