May v. Autozone Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employee suffered no tangible employment actions because she “was not fired” nor “passed over for a promotion, reassigned, or given any change in benefits” by the alleged harasser
• “The Supreme Court has recognized a distinction in Title VII sexual harassment cases between those based on threats that are carried out (often referred to as quid pro quo cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).