May Department Stores Co. v. Paolucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a § 1983 plaintiff must allege deprivation of a right under federal law and that defendant acted under color or state authority
• explaining that a § 1983 plaintiff must allege deprivation of a right under federal law and that defendant acted under color or state authority
• rejecting plaintiff’s attempt “to circumvent” absolute witness 26 immunity “by alleging a conspiracy to present false testimony”
• ex tending absolute immunity to conspiracy to commit perjury where the witnesses conspired to present consistent testimony at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).