May Department Stores Co. v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence as to certain appellants sufficient because they were bookmakers who exchanged line information on an almost daily basis
• violation where defendants supplied line information, accepted “layoff’ bets, and provided advice on gambling operations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).