Maxwell v. Whieldon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that custodial interference is relevant to determining history of domestic violence
• distinguishing in dicta \short period of time\ from \protracted period\ of time
• “The ‘adequacy of the notice and hearing afforded a litigant’ is a question of constitutional law ‘to which we apply our independent judgment.’ ” (quoting Debra P. v. Laurence S., 309 P.3d 1258, 1260 (Alaska 2013))
• “[T]o commit custodial interference a person must take, keep, or entice the child from a lawful custodian with the intent to hold the child for a protracted period with no legal right to do so.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).