District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/20/2013
Maxwell v. State
Citations
- 110 So. 3d 958
- 2013 WL 1136416
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that if two competing interpretations are reasonably plausible, a court must strictly construe the statute in the accused’s favor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Damoorgian, Gross, Hanzman, Michael
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
- OB/GYN Specialists of the Palm Beaches, P.A. v. MejiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-08· cited 13×
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. PASCAL ESTIMEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-19· cited 4×
- Simone Maxwell, a/k/a Symone Maxwell v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-17· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 432×
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-03-14· cited 149×
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-12-17· cited 90×
- Polite v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-09-27· cited 65×
- Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-06-18· cited 58×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-15· cited 51×
- Gyongyosi v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-15· cited 10×
- Wallace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-19· cited 6×
- Span v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.