Maxwell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the absence of an adjudication does not prevent the conviction from being considered in a habitual offender proceeding
• holding that the absence of an adjudication does not prevent the conviction from being considered in a habitual offender proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dorfman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-07-28· cited 69×
• United States v. Willis
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-02-28· cited 28×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-03-04· cited 17×
• United States v. Lester
  S.D. Florida· 1991-12-12· cited 10×
• United States v. Thompson
  N.D. Florida· 1991-02-04· cited 9×
• Smith v. Bartlett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-25· cited 8×
• Harnum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-18· cited 5×
• Connolly v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-01-22· cited 3×
• People ex rel. Cassarino v. New York State Division of Parole
  New York Supreme Court· 1996-09-13· cited 1×
• State v. Tidwell
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1990-03-16
• Hines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Singletary v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-03-06· cited 55×
• Pope v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-09-27· cited 53×
• State v. Gazda
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-09-15· cited 49×
• Darden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-01-24· cited 45×
• Patterson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-03-26· cited 7×