Skip to main content

Maxwell v. State

Citations

  • 531 S.W.2d 468
  • 259 Ark. 86
  • 1976 Ark. LEXIS 2035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[w]e unhesitatingly find that the mere fact that Hanis’ statement was self-incriminating was an adequate basis for according reliability and credibility to the informant”
  • \[w]e unhesitatingly find that the mere fact that Hanis' statement was self-incriminating was an adequate basis for according reliability and credibility to the informant\
  • \We unhesitatingly find that the mere fact that Harris's statement was self-incriminating was an adequate basis for according reliability and credibility to the informant[.]\
  • ‘‘[w]e unhesitatingly find that the mere fact that [the informant’s] statement was self-incriminating was an adequate basis for according reliability and credi- bility’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fogleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.