Maxwell v. Seely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that without this information, “the Court simply cannot determine whether the claimed privilege is appropriate”
• requiring defendant “to advise whether or not it intends to rely on an ‘advice-of-counsel’ defense” before trial to avoid “unnecessary delay or expense”
• requiring defendant \to advise whether or not it intends to rely on an 'advice-of-counsel' defense\ before trial to avoid \unnecessary delay or expense\
• citing, inter alia, Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 US. 383, 389 (1981)
• allowing the defendant to assert attorney-client privilege as to specific documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).