Maxwell v. Inman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting rules of statutory construction, including that court must give effect to obvious meaning of unambiguous statutory language and that words are construed according to their common and approved usage
• “Accordingly, we hold that Appellee’s claim, which related to the value of his remaining property as affected by the taking, was not required to be, nor could it have been, raised by preliminary objections [to the declaration of taking] under Section 406(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).