Maxwell v. City of Topeka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the logical reason for the [K.S.A. 44-5l!(a)(2)(E)] provisos appears to have been a legislative attempt to add fringe benefits into a claimant’s average weekly wage only when such benefits have, in fact, been cut off from the claimant”
• noting that “the logical reason for the [K.S.A. 44-5l!(a)(2)(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).