Skip to main content
Court of Claims· 11/9/1967

Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 181 Ct. Cl. 607
  • 386 F.2d 855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the government’s unprotesting observation of a test was evidence that the contractor had reasonably interpreted the contract’s test procedure requirements
  • government is entitled to strict comphance without regard to whether contractor beheves this is prudent or desirable
  • information that plaintiff was testing dynamometers in an unnecessarily expensive and impossible way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collins, Cowbn, Davis, Durbee, Laramore, Nichols, Skelton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.