Maxus Energy Corp v.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising jurisdiction and vacating Board decision because the Board erred by referring rather than remanding a claim for dependency and indemnity compensation that was in \appellate status\
• exercising jurisdiction and concluding that, because the appellant had filed an NOD, the Board erred by referring a matter to the RO rather than remanding for issuance of an SOC
• remanding, where claim was in appellate status before Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board), claim unadjudicated by BVA and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regional office (RO) for BVA to remand to VARO
• remanding, where claim was in appellate status before Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board), claim unadjudicated by BVA and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regional office (RO) for BVA to remand to VARO
• where a claimant has submitted a notice of disagreement, but a Statement of the Case has not yet been issued, a remand is necessary
• widow of veteran of New Philippine Scouts not entitled to non-service-connected death pension because veteran’s service not considered active service for VA benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).