· 8/12/1986
Maxine SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 798 F.2d 210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding conduct of which plaintiff complained too isolated and lacked the repetitive effect necessary to maintain a hostile environment claim
- to prove a hostile working environment, plaintiff must show that the harassment was “severe, debilitating or pervasive”
- not sufficient for a sexual harassment claim where plaintiff being subjected to propositions, lewd comments and a slap on the buttocks when these were relatively isolated instances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Eschbach, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.