Maximo Hilao, Class v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, and Imelda R. Marcos Ferdinand R. Marcos, Representatives of the Estate of Ferdinand Marcos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the sanction of holding facts in a complaint as established was proper
• holding that the sanction of holding facts in a complaint as established was proper
• finding that a party who fails to respond at all 25 to interrogatories or requests for production is subject to sanctions
• explaining that if a party dies and the claim is not extinguished by applicable substantive law, the court may order substitution of the decedent by a “proper party”
• holding the district court did not abuse its 1 discretion in imposing preclusion sanction for parties’ failure to appear at their depositions where 2 they “made no attempt to explain or excuse their failure to appear”
• explaining 10 || that once a party substitute under Rule 25(a) “steps into the same position as the original party’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).