· 9/20/2021
Maximo Fernandez v. Kerry, Inc.
Citations
- 14 F.4th 644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a defendant does not necessarily appeal his case properly simply because the court has “authority over [the] case and the constitutional issue raised”
- recognizing that involuntary commitment to a mental institution constitutes a deprivation of liberty that invokes the constitutional protection of procedural due process
- concluding that “the fact that we have authority over this case and the constitutional issue raised does not necessarily mean that the defendant has properly appealed the case”
- concluding that “the fact that we have authority over this case and the constitutional issue raised does not necessarily mean that the defendant has properly appealed the case”
- stating that the case should have been appealed pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 9 or 10 but suspending the appellate rules to hear the case on its merits
- “involuntary commitment to 12 A designated professional is defined in T.C.A. § 33-5-427(b) as: (b) If a person: (1) Is a qualified mental health professional under § 33-1-101; (2) Is licensed or certified to practice in the state if required for the discipline; and (3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.