Maxfly Aviation, Inc. v. Capital Airlines Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the addition of the post-judgment interest rate does not disturb or revise the legal rights and obligations previously established and function as do the words \for which let execution issue\ when added later
• noting that a “trial judge’s careful addition of the words nunc pro tunc to the amended judgment indicates rather strongly that the court itself intended no material or substantive change”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).