Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited

Oral argument

• Argued

  31 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “erogenous zones . . . still include (whether justifiably or not in the eyes of all) the female, but not the male, breast”
• noting that female breasts have traditionally been regarded by society as an erogenous zone
• finding \important\ the \government interest ... [in] protecting the moral sensibilities of that substantial segment of society that still does not want to be exposed\ to parts of the body \that traditionally in this society have been regarded as erogenous zones\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).