Skip to main content
· 11/26/2025

Maxe v. Rosa

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5325

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by terminating the parties' shared-parenting plan and by designating appellee as the legal custodian and residential parent of the parties' minor child. The trial court also did not err by ordering appellant to pay his share of work-related childcare expenses. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hanseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.