Skip to main content
· 6/15/1964

Mawhinney v. Porte Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 21 A.D.2d 809
  • 250 N.Y.S.2d 839
  • 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The defendant's further claim that his mere presence in the stolen vehicle did not provide a basis for his arrest is similarly without merit, since Penal Law § 165.05(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.