Maverick Oil & Gas Co. v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the same in the context of First Amendment retaliation claim related to action taken against plaintiff after she refused to answer officers' questions
• “California Constitutional 3 right to privacy contained in article I, section 1 does not give rise to a cause of action for money 4 damages”
• allegations of 13 retaliation are sufficient to infer intent to injure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).