Mauzy v. Mauzy
Citations
- 79 Va. 537
- 1884 Va. LEXIS 109
Syllabus
<p>1. Married Women—Separate Estate—Jus disponendi.—It is settled law in Virginia that a married woman may alien or charge her separate estate unless the instrument creating it expressly or impliedly denies or limits her power so to do. Bain v. Buff, 76 Va. 371.</p> <p>2. Deeds—Construction—Motive.—In a conveyance the words in the habendum, “for the sole and separate use and benefit of the wife and her children forever,” do not give any estate to the children, but indicate the motive for the gift to the mother. Bain v. Buff, supra.</p>
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- St. James v. Bagley.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1905-05-16· cited 37×
- Seibel v. RappSupreme Court of Virginia· 1888-05-10· cited 16×
- Stace v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1892-11-17· cited 16×
- Rixey's Adm'r v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Virginia· 1888-05-17· cited 11×
- Walke & Wife v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia· 1898-03-31· cited 11×
- Remke v. RemkeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1929-12-06· cited 2×
- Maynard v. United Thacker Coal Co.Fourth Circuit· 1919-10-07
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Mauzy v. Mauzy
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.