Mauzy v. Legislative Redistricting Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “first regular session following the publication” of the census encompasses a regular session that was convened before publication so long as publication occurred during the session
• holding that enactment of invalid statute attempting apportionment of state into representative districts did not “rob[] the Board of jurisdiction to apportion the state into such districts” and stating “mandamus never lies to control official discretion of a state board”
• cases from other jurisdictions are merely persuasive and not determinative even when facts are almost identical
• cases from other jurisdictions are merely persuasive and not determinative even when facts are almost identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).