Maus v. Joint Township District Mem. Hospital (In Re Maus)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is clear that the nature of the garnishment action undertaken against the Debtor qualifies, for purposes of § 522(g), as an involuntary transfer of property”
• “[N]owhere in the statute is it stated or even implied that the recovery of a preference may only be for the amount which is in excess of the [s]ix [h]undred dollar ($600.00) threshold of § 547(c)(8). ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).