Skip to main content
· 4/25/2002

Mauro Vargas-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 287 F.3d 882
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 4569
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3584
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the EOIR 26 form advised aliens that (‘The failure to specify the factual or legal basis for the appeal may lead to summary dismissal without further notice....”
  • finding that language contained in a Notice of Appeal form misled aliens to believe that they need only make a brief statement of their desire for appeal rather than state the specific allegations of error
  • observing that “EOIR-26 still fails to tell the alien, especially a pro se alien ... that what is really required is what amounts to a true legal brief complete with reference to authorities — statutes, regulations, cases, etc.”
  • observing that “EOIR-26 still fails to tell the alien, especially a pro se alien . . . that what is really required is what amounts to a true legal brief complete with reference to authorities— statutes, regulations, cases, etc.”
  • involving a pro se petitioner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Rawlinson, Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.