· 4/25/2002
Mauro Vargas-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Citations
- 287 F.3d 882
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 4569
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3584
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the EOIR 26 form advised aliens that (‘The failure to specify the factual or legal basis for the appeal may lead to summary dismissal without further notice....”
- finding that language contained in a Notice of Appeal form misled aliens to believe that they need only make a brief statement of their desire for appeal rather than state the specific allegations of error
- observing that “EOIR-26 still fails to tell the alien, especially a pro se alien ... that what is really required is what amounts to a true legal brief complete with reference to authorities — statutes, regulations, cases, etc.”
- observing that “EOIR-26 still fails to tell the alien, especially a pro se alien . . . that what is really required is what amounts to a true legal brief complete with reference to authorities— statutes, regulations, cases, etc.”
- involving a pro se petitioner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Rawlinson, Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.