Mauro v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and holding that attorneys that do not regularly extend credit do not qualify as “creditors” under TILA
• under TILA, “ ‘[w]hether an investment loan is for a personal or a business purpose requires a case by case analysis’ ” (quoting Thorns v. Sundance Properties, 726 F.2d 1417, 1419 (9th Cir. 1984))
• under TILA, \ '[w]hether an investment loan is for a personal or a business purpose requires a case by case analysis' \ (quoting Thorns v. Sundance Properties, 726 F.2d 1417, 1419 (9th Cir. 1984)
• \TILA's disclosure obligations apply only to 'creditors'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).