Skip to main content
· 9/21/2018

Mauricio Palomino v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying asylum and withholding of removal because “[a]lthough the Mara 18 gang may have some political motivations, the record here supports a -6- finding that Prieto-Pineda was harassed for refusing to provide rides, not for any political opposition to the gang”
  • the petitioners did not show the government was unable or unwilling to protect them when the police responded to calls and scared away gang members
  • “Although the Mara 18 gang may have some political motivations, the record here supports a finding that Prieto-Pineda was harassed for refusing to provide rides [to gang members], not for any political opposition to the gang.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.