Skip to main content
· 3/2/1988

Maurice Shacket and Sylvia Shacket, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellees v. Philko Aviation, Inc., Defendant-Counterplaintiff-Appellant

Citations

  • 841 F.2d 166
  • 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 727
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3007
  • 1988 WL 19073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that implied actual notice requires “(1) actual knowledge of (2) highly suspicious circumstances, coupled with (3) an unaccountable failure to react to them”
  • noting that implied actual notice, which “requires (1) actual knowledge of (2) highly suspicious circumstances, coupled with (3) an unaccountable failure to react to them,” is not the equivalent of actual knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.